IIENetworkSite Search IIENetwork Member Website of the Institute of International Education IIENetwork.org
IIENetwork Home
Membership
Articles and Papers
Resources for Educators
Best Practices in Internationalization
Open Doors: Student Mobility
Atlas of Student Mobility
Quick Links for Members
Member Directory
IIE.Interactive Newsletter
Job Board
Upcoming Events and Deadlines
Links
Other IIE Resources
IIE Online
IIE Bookstore
IIEPassport Study Abroad Programs
Fulbright Web
Intensive English USA
Funding for U.S. Study
Study Abroad Funding
Site Map
Contact Information
Members: Please Log In Contact Us

You are here: IIE Network HomeResources for EducatorsPapers / ArticlesArticle ArchivesVariousLaw Review Article

Law Review Article

Transnational Lawyer
Spring 2003

Comments

THE USA PATRIOT ACT AND THE ENHANCED BORDER SECURITY AND VISA ENTRY REFORM ACT:
NEGATIVELY IMPACTING ACADEMIC INSTITUTIONS BY DETERRING FOREIGN STUDENTS FROM STUDYING IN THE UNITED STATES

Adrian Arroyo [FNa1]

Copyright © 2003 University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law; Adrian


Summary:
This Comment illustrates how the USA PATRIOT Act and the Border Security Bill will negatively impact graduate institutions by decreasing the number of foreign students wanting to study in the United States and increasing the cost for institutions that enroll foreign students. Part II provides an overview of immigration law and discusses recent changes in the law as a result of the USA PATRIOT Act and the Border Security Bill. [FN24] Part III presents the major criticisms of the USA PATRIOT Act and the Border Security Bill in relation to foreign students and universities. [FN25] These criticisms include concerns about amending foreign students' federal privacy rights, substantial delays in the approval of student visa applications, and the high costs associated with implementing SEVIS. Part IV proposes solutions to combat these problems while preserving the goals of the foreign student monitoring system. This Comment reaches the conclusion that the negative impact the USA PATRIOT Act and the Border Security Bill may have on graduate institutions and the U.S. economy is substantially outweighed by the fact that these Acts will help prevent future terrorism directed at the United States. Thus, Congress should continue to implement of the USA PATRIOT Act and the Border Security Bill in addition to adopting the solutions proposed in Part IV of this Comment in order to limit the negative impact on foreign students and universities.

Click here to download the article in word format.
(This is a large file of 28 pages -- it may take a minute to download)



We have opened a discussion forum on the IIENetwork website and welcome your comments and perspectives about this article. Please click on the first discussion thread called "Law Review Article on Impact of US Patriot Act on Universities" to access the discussion.
Visa Issues/Immigration
You are here: Visa Issues/ImmigrationLaw Review Article on Impact of US Patriot Act on Universities

Subject: Law Review Article on Impact of US Patriot Act on Universities
Posted By: daniel
Date Posted: 8/5/03
Below is a summary and link to an article that was published in the Spring 2003 edition of the journal "Transnational Lawyer." This law review article reviews the impact of the USA PATRIOT Act and the Border Security Bill on academic institutions in the United States.

We welcome your comments and perspectives about this article. You can post your comments by clicking on the reply button.

Summary
"This Comment illustrates how the USA PATRIOT Act and the Border
Security Bill will negatively impact graduate institutions by decreasing the number of foreign students wanting to study in the United States and increasing the cost for institutions that enroll foreign students. Part II provides an overview of immigration law and discusses recent changes in the law as a result of the USA PATRIOT Act and the Border Security Bill. [FN24] Part III presents the major criticisms of the USA PATRIOT Act and the Border Security Bill in relation to foreign students and universities. [FN25] These criticisms include concerns about amending foreign students' federal privacy rights, substantial delays in the approval of student visa applications, and the high costs associated with implementing SEVIS. Part IV proposes solutions to combat these problems while preserving the goals of the foreign student monitoring system. This Comment reaches the conclusion that the negative impact the USA PATRIOT Act and the Border Security Bill may have on graduate institutions and the U.S. economy is substantially outweighed by the fact that these Acts will help prevent future terrorism directed at the United States. Thus, Congress should continue to implement of the USA PATRIOT Act and the Border Security Bill in addition to adopting the solutions proposed in Part IV of this Comment in order to limit the negative impact on foreign students and universities."

To read the complete article, please go to:
http://www.iienetwork.org/?p=33308